Question, comment or picture of your private parts?




South-West corner of the Woolies carpark at 6pm. Come alone.

3 Comments on “Contact”

  1. David Jones says:

    Hello there! I’m David and I saw your website as I was doing a Yahoo and google. I want to learn how you feel your website compares towards your competitors. Is it possible to generate sufficient visitors with it? I ask since I see potential for making it an integral part of your company’s advertising plan. By boosting it and making it more appealing And customer-friendly to your market, it can supply the boost that you will be looking to achieve for the expanding business.

    I’ve been in this business for many years and that i have witnessed start-up firms expand exponentially through the use of their webpage to the full . We can reach that goal in 1 or 2 methods.

    1. We can build on the actual design and style that you have, by enhancing the layout or introducing much more enjoyable features upon it to hold clients on your site

  2. socratus says:

    History of the “quantum of action” (1900-1927) / by Socratus /
    In 1900 Planck united together two formulas ( Rayleigh–Jeansfor
    for long and Wien’s for short wavelengths) and then divided them.
    He was himself very surprised when the result was found correct.
    And after that came . . . .
    : ” . . . some weeks of the hardest work of my life . . .”
    The result was – quantum of action (as energy multiply time: h=Et)
    The coefficient (h) was neither in the Rayleigh–Jeansfor nor in the
    Wien’s formulas. Planck took unit (h) as in some books are written:
    “intuitively, instinctively, phenomenologically”
    In 1905 Einstein introduced unit (h) in different way.
    Einstein wrote it as: h=kb
    (Boltzmann coefficient multiply Wien’s displacement constant)
    And in 1906 Einstein wrote that Planck’s and his results are equal.
    But Einstein’s formula explains quantum nature more clearly.

    For practical uses both Planck and Einstein multiplied
    “quantum of action” by frequency : E=hf.
    In 1913 Bohr introduced “quant of action” in the hydrogen-atom.
    In 1916 Sommerfeld wrote that “quantum of action” took part in
    the “fine structure ” ( and as result we have complete full formula
    of electron’s structure: e^2=ah*c)
    In 1923 De Broglie wrote that “quant of action” can be “pilot-wave”.
    In 1924 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck wrote that “quant of action”
    can work in another way as: h/2pi (h-bar)
    In 1924 Pauli discovered that “the quantum of action” must obey
    “the exclusion principle”.
    In 1925 Heisenberg went a step further.
    He discovered “the uncertainty principle” (HUP): Et>h*, px>h*.
    In the same 1925 year Schrodinger explained that
    de Broglie’s “pilot-wave” can work as “psi-wave function”.
    In 1926 Schrodinger found relation between his “psi-wave
    function” and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
    In 1926 Born showed that could be probability of finding
    the “quant of action” in local place of the “psi-wave function”.
    In1927 Dirac “put into place the last of quantum theory’s
    building blocks”. He “playing with beautiful equations”
    explained that the “quantum of action” must have one
    negative anti-brother (-E=Mc^2) in “an unobserved infinite sea”.
    The QM interpretation doesn’t fit the logical presentation.
    Feynman wrote:
    ” The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature
    as absurd from the point of view of common sense.
    And it agrees fully with experiment.
    So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd.”
    / Book: QED : The Strange Theory of Light and Matter /

    My conclusion.
    Nature is not an absurd structure.
    It is our “scientific” thought of Nature can be absurd,
    it is our “philosophy of science” can be abstract.
    How is possible to escape philosophical absurd?
    My solution.
    The history of the “quantum of action” (1900-1927) shows that
    “quantum of action” can be a quantum of light, and
    “quantum of action” can be an electron, and
    “quantum of action” has connection with an antiparticle . . . . .
    In the other words,
    quantum of light, electron and antiparticle can be one and the same
    real particle of different actions in different conditions. This is possible
    because “quantum of action” obeys “ The law of conservation and
    transformation energy/mass”. “Quantum of action” has many formulas
    and they can be tied together only through physical process of
    “transformation” but what “transformation” means according to one
    single “quantum of action” nobody explains.
    The Existence begins on the quantum level and “quantum of action” is
    primary particle of existence. Not from “big bang”, not from “Higgs boson”,
    not from “string particles in 11-D”, not from “meson, muon, tau . . . .
    and 1000 their brothers” but only from Planck’s / Einstein’s
    “quantum of action” creation of Nature was started.
    Best wishes.
    Israel Sadovnik Socratus

  3. socratus says:

    God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/
    To discover so-called God – particle ( Nobel Prize in 2013)
    was needed two conditions : deep vacuum and high energy.
    But if the vacuum were deeper and energy were higher then
    it would be possible to discover some kind of a new God – particles.
    Question: what is the deepest vacuum in the Universe?
    My answer:
    the deepest vacuum in the Universe is the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K.
    Question: what can be the highest energy?
    My answer:
    the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K continuum is itself some kind
    of infinite energy continuum.
    Using these parameters, I say that the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K
    can create primary God – particles and their names are
    “potential molar –masses (k) particles.”
    Why potential molar – masses (k) particles are primary God particles?
    Heat is result of some kind of chaotic movements of particles.
    In thermodynamics the heat is explained by the formula: E=kT (logW)
    It means that chaotic movements of molar-mass (k) particles create heat.
    In 1905 Einstein wrote “quantum of action” as: h=kb
    It means that molar-mass (k) particles know some kind of another
    movement which can create “quantum of action” with energy E=(kb)*f.
    My conclusion.
    Without heat the Universe is an Absolute Cold Kingdom.
    Without “quantum of action” the Universe is dead continuum.
    The molar-mass (k) particles can take part in these two phenomenons:
    E=kT (logW) and E= (kb)*f. And therefore the molar-mass (k)
    particles are primary elements from the First Instant (T=0K) of the
    Universe’s creation. Not ” the famous Higgs Boson” (with the low
    energy and prestige Prize) but the old and modest well-known
    molar-mass k-particles are real “God particles”
    k-particles have two forms of modifications: as a heat E=kT (logW)
    and as an energy E=(kb)*f . The interaction between energy and heat
    created everything in the Universe but . . . . but until today nobody
    explained the interaction between E= (kb)*f and E=kT (logW).
    Best wishes.
    Israel Sadovnik Socratus.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s